Amber Heard has been accused of editing photos of her bruises during her defamation trial. Unsealed documents show his team accused Johnny Depp of the same.

• Amber Heard’s workforce says a forensic evaluation calls into query the authenticity of harm photographs submitted by Johnny Depp.
• Heard was additionally accused of modifying photographs of alleged abuse throughout his defamation trial.
• Practically 6,000 pages of Depp-Heard trial paperwork have been unsealed over the weekend.

Amber Heard’s legal professionals have accused Johnny Depp of modifying photographs of her scratches and bruises, in addition to audio of Heard, which was submitted as a part of their defamation lawsuit earlier this yr, paperwork present. just lately revealed courtroom circumstances.

Heard’s workforce, together with legal professionals Benjamin Rotterborn and Elaine Bredehoft, claimed that the metadata of the photographs submitted by Depp’s workforce contained dates displaying that the photographs have been altered years after they have been taken, in response to a request from December 2021 question that was unsealed over the weekend and reviewed by The Day by day Beast.

Among the many alleged discrepancies was a photograph that had a creation date of 2019, regardless that the photograph was allegedly taken in 2015, in response to the question. One other photograph had no creation date however had an edited date of July 2020, Heard’s workforce stated.

The workforce additionally requested Depp to provide “all recordings containing Ms. Heard’s voice,” the request states, however alleged that the audio information offered had been altered. Heard’s workforce requested the complete audio.

Forensic professional Julian Ackert, who was employed by Heard’s workforce to evaluation Depp’s photograph and audio paperwork, questioned their authenticity, The Day by day Beast reported.

“Lacking creation dates and/or post-fact modification dates could also be an indication of manipulation of digital proof,” Heard’s workforce stated of Ackert’s evaluation.

The courtroom determined to exclude Ackert’s testimony through the trial, in response to a movement filed by Depp’s workforce.

Depp’s workforce argued that the “modified” dates Ackert was referring to meant when the picture was final recorded and stated Ackert’s findings would create “unfair prejudice” that might “lead the jury In error”.

Heard got here below intense scrutiny through the trial after two pictures of her bruises from Could 2016 have been proven aspect by aspect through the trial, with one picture considerably redder than the opposite.

Depp’s workforce alleged that Heard altered the photographs to make his face “redder”, which Heard denied. Heard stated the photographs seemed completely different as a result of lighting.

Depp’s legal professional then introduced in witnesses who stated they did not discover any bruising on Heard’s face on the time.

Ackert testified at trial that Heard’s photographs have been unique. Depp’s forensic witness, Bryan Neumeister, stated he couldn’t confirm whether or not or not the photographs have been altered.

A lawyer for Depp didn’t instantly reply to Insider’s request for remark.